![]() The differences are in frequencies, TDP, and included cooler as well as price, of course. Specifications-wise, the Ryclosely matches the Ryzen 5 3600X, with six cores, 12 threads, 32MB 元 cache and 512KB L2 cache per core, bringing the total of AMD's so-called GameCache to 35MB, which is 1MB less than the two eight-core models. With a fairly lowly maximum boost frequency of 4.2GHz, the Rymight actually be the CPU that benefits most from manual overclocking for a change, seeing as all 3rd Gen Ryzen CPUs we've tested so far have made it past 4.2GHz with ease with an all-core overclock, which would better anything PBO could achieve and provide boosts to both single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. With the latest 3rd Gen Ryzen parts, there's a £40 gap between the Ryzen 5 3600X and Ryzen 5 3600, so the age-old question about whether the cheaper part can overclock to similar speeds as the X-edition part is very relevant here. ![]() In many ways, they've offered some of the best bang for your buck of both first- and and second-generation Ryzen CPUs and a significant step up in multi-threaded performance from CPUs with two or four cores. The six-core models of AMD's Ryzen CPUs have, so far, consisted of the same variety - a non X-edition part that sits at slightly lower clock speeds and notably lower TDP, and the X-edition chip perhaps being a better bet for those wanting to stick to stock speeds. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |